Kelly over at DarkReading wrote an article
about the results of a career survey initiated last year. It reveals
that over 50% of the information security professionals are not
satisfied with their current jobs. And no, salary is not the main issue,
it is not even in the top 3! Most of these unhappy people complain
about their career advancement possibilities, about the fact that the
job is not challenging enough, or that there is no opportunity for
creative thinking. Want to know more? Read Kelly's article, or visit
Kushner and Murray during their workshop at Defcon.
July 2009 Archives
Always wanted a decent shell in Windows, but don't feel like learning to
use PowerShell? Use Ubuntu
Portable! It runs Ubuntu as if it were a Windows application,
allowing you to use any Linux applications you want just like that.
Don from the Security Ripcord blog posted about
an experience he had with Symantec and Microsoft. He had found malware
hidden in the windows registry of one of his clients, and the vendors
would not believe it and actually stated that what he says is 'not
possible'. A nice writeup
from Sophos, however, indicates it IS in fact possible to hide malware
in the registry!
Reminds me of my attempt to try convince HP that 3 printers at one of our customer's premises connected to malicious domains. Also 'not possible' ;)
Reminds me of my attempt to try convince HP that 3 printers at one of our customer's premises connected to malicious domains. Also 'not possible' ;)
Jack Goldsmith (New York Times) pleads
for a government regulation of computer security. I do agree with him
that some regulations should be implemented, also in Europe. We already
have laws saying that if you don't lock the doors of your house or your
car door, you're responsible for the consequences. But not every
computer or network breach can be avoided by regulations, and users
can't always be kept responsible. For example, one can't expect from the
everyday user to protect himself from zero-days. I would however
regulate the fact that users should have at least a firewall and
anti-virus, and that signatures should be updated on a regular basis.
Then if a user would for example be victim of a zero-day, and his
computer is used for larger attacks, at least he can say "I had
signature version such-and-such", and it can be deducted that his
anti-virus did not yet protect against this threat at that specific time
or date. I think at least a user should have an up-to-date anti-virus
and firewall, and if they don't they can be kept responsible.
Peter Silberman and Steve Davis (both from Mandiant) found a method to
discover the use of Metaspl0it's Meterpreter and how to construct the
session, uncovering the attacker's tracks. They will present their
findings at Black
Hat this summer.
" During this talk we discuss accessing physical memory for the purpose of acquiring a specific processes’ address space. Process address space acquisition includes DLLs, EXEs, stacks and heaps. This includes memory resident modules. We describe in detail how meterpeter operates in memory and specifically how memory looks when meterpreter scripts/commands are executed and the residue these scripts create in the exploited processes’ memory space. Finally, we tie all this knowledge together and discuss how to reconstruct a meterpreter session – completely from memory – and determine what the attacker was doing on the exploited machine. "
Sir John Sawers, the new head (as of November 2009) of British Secret
Intelligence Service (better known as MI6), is currently experiencing
first hand the possible negative consequences of social networking. His
wife posted personal pictures and address information on Facebook
without protecting her profile. An investigation is ongoing to verify if
Sawers can still assume his new function, as there is fear for the
security of his family and friends after this information was leaked.
Source: ZDNet
Source: ZDNet
For all of us security adepts out there blaming it all on 'the user', David Lacey
wrote a book
recently about managing our layer 8 problems!
