This
one caught my eye this morning. Apparently, as of November in the
USA, the use of a proxy when conducting a crime might increase one's
sentence by up to 25%, as this is seen as evidence of sophistication. I
mean, come on, many people don't even know they are behind proxies!
Admitted, they shouldn't commit crimes, and it may be harder to track
someone that did commit a crime through a proxy, but hey its not
impossible... and to increase the sentence for it? That's just totally
irrelevant.
It would be like increasing the sentence for someone because they formatted a hard drive or deleted a partition table to cover their tracks. It makes the job of the investigator a tad harder, but not impossible!
And should one's sentence be increased for it? I don't really see the link between the adversary being 'smart' and him being punished harder than an idiot :)
UPDATE: The U.S. Sentencing Commission decided to drop above mentioned amendment as the language used to describe it was too general.
It would be like increasing the sentence for someone because they formatted a hard drive or deleted a partition table to cover their tracks. It makes the job of the investigator a tad harder, but not impossible!
And should one's sentence be increased for it? I don't really see the link between the adversary being 'smart' and him being punished harder than an idiot :)
UPDATE: The U.S. Sentencing Commission decided to drop above mentioned amendment as the language used to describe it was too general.
